My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/10/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
4/10/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s � � <br />Attorney Robin Lloyd informed the Board that particular <br />property is the Indian River Industrial Park, Inc., property; <br />they have a survey and it is 20+ acres. His contention is that <br />the planners were not totally familiar with this piece of prop- <br />erty, which, as recently as 4/5 months ago, was Light Industrial, <br />and they were going for a site plan to put a factory in there. <br />He stressed that this property is in a very badly blighted area; <br />it is right across the street from bars that are in terrible <br />disrepair; and there is nothing about this property that is <br />residential. Attorney Lloyd pointed out that the Plan states <br />that we want to have reasonable economic development, and if you <br />are going to have it anywhere, you want it right next to the <br />railroad tracks. He did believe the Planners made a mistake <br />because this is basically an industrial area, and there is an <br />industrial corridor all along 41st Street between U.S.I to 58th. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that his observation from <br />driving that area and looking at the maps is that what Attorney <br />Lloyd is suggesting is the logical transition, and he is not sure <br />what exactly did or did not happen in the Planners' minds. <br />Planner Loeper explained that when developing the overall <br />Land Use Map, we were dealing with a lot of generalities, and in <br />specific areas such as this, staff did not have the luxury of <br />having the time to go out and look at every individual parcel and <br />make the determination on that basis. . <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if the Board has enough latitude <br />to accept the request of Mr. Lloyd, and Attorney Vitunac felt <br />that the Board has heard the presentation; they can make the <br />decision to declare it was a mistake and make their ruling. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously agreed with <br />Chairman Eggert that there is a transition and that <br />the subject property should be IL, the way it was <br />before. <br />49 <br />BOOK f'�1�r 83S, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.