Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br />Subject to modifications <br />rail corridor can be softened appropriately to better complement downtown <br />redevelopment efforts. <br />(7) Tri -Rail Coastal Link Access Negotiations <br />Since 2004, local governments in Miami -Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties have <br />been working with FDOT and other agencies towards the extension of Tri -Rail commuter <br />service on the FEC rail corridor. Access negotiations between FDOT, FECI, and the <br />South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) began last year. AAF stations <br />in West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami have been designed to accommodate <br />future Tri -Rail service as well. This multi -modal connectivity can extend the benefits of <br />the AAF service to other local governments where additional Tri -Rail stations would be <br />located. To help reduce project impacts and costs to local governments, the following <br />mitigating measure is suggested: <br />• Finalize Reasonable Access Fees and Terms for Tri -Rail Coastal Link Service: FECI, <br />FDOT, and SFRTA should work together to determine reasonable access fees and <br />terms to enable commuter service to be established on the corridor from Jupiter to <br />Miami in conjunction with the development of the AAF project. <br />Conclusion <br />The proposed AAF service represents a unique opportunity to expand the utilization of a private <br />freight corridor for economic benefit and mobility. The FEC rail corridor provides a connection <br />to dozens of historic downtowns, both large and small, that were all once "railroad towns." <br />However, the service as currently proposed does not consider the corridor's development pattern, <br />locating only three stations in southeast Florida, where economic benefit is focused. The balance <br />of the Region is bypassed, which imposes project costs without meaningful benefit. The project's <br />navigational impacts at the Loxahatchee River and St. Lucie River are considerable, and <br />measures to reduce these impacts, including the potential for freight reallocation and regulatory <br />adjustment, remain outstanding. Other potential project benefits, such as broadband access, quiet <br />zones, grade crossing improvements, and commuter rail access, also warrant further evaluation. <br />These significant issues should be raised for consideration in the EIS well in advance of its <br />publication to ensure their thorough evaluation by the FRA and collaborating agencies. Further, <br />given the magnitude of potential impacts from the proposed project, efforts should be taken to <br />arrange a FRA workshop in the Region for local governments and others to fully understand the <br />process and methods by which public comments will be received and evaluated. <br />These issues have also been communicated in correspondence to Governor Scott, the Treasure <br />Coast Legislative Delegation, and the Treasure Coast Congressional Delegation. This <br />correspondence is attached. <br />8 <br />