My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/15/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
04/15/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:46:11 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/15/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
317
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000D\S0003VK.tif
SmeadsoftID
13701
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
317
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Subject to modifications <br />rail corridor can be softened appropriately to better complement downtown <br />redevelopment efforts. <br />(7) Tri -Rail Coastal Link Access Negotiations <br />Since 2004, local governments in Miami -Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties have <br />been working with FDOT and other agencies towards the extension of Tri -Rail commuter <br />service on the FEC rail corridor. Access negotiations between FDOT, FECI, and the <br />South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) began last year. AAF stations <br />in West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami have been designed to accommodate <br />future Tri -Rail service as well. This multi -modal connectivity can extend the benefits of <br />the AAF service to other local governments where additional Tri -Rail stations would be <br />located. To help reduce project impacts and costs to local governments, the following <br />mitigating measure is suggested: <br />• Finalize Reasonable Access Fees and Terms for Tri -Rail Coastal Link Service: FECI, <br />FDOT, and SFRTA should work together to determine reasonable access fees and <br />terms to enable commuter service to be established on the corridor from Jupiter to <br />Miami in conjunction with the development of the AAF project. <br />Conclusion <br />The proposed AAF service represents a unique opportunity to expand the utilization of a private <br />freight corridor for economic benefit and mobility. The FEC rail corridor provides a connection <br />to dozens of historic downtowns, both large and small, that were all once "railroad towns." <br />However, the service as currently proposed does not consider the corridor's development pattern, <br />locating only three stations in southeast Florida, where economic benefit is focused. The balance <br />of the Region is bypassed, which imposes project costs without meaningful benefit. The project's <br />navigational impacts at the Loxahatchee River and St. Lucie River are considerable, and <br />measures to reduce these impacts, including the potential for freight reallocation and regulatory <br />adjustment, remain outstanding. Other potential project benefits, such as broadband access, quiet <br />zones, grade crossing improvements, and commuter rail access, also warrant further evaluation. <br />These significant issues should be raised for consideration in the EIS well in advance of its <br />publication to ensure their thorough evaluation by the FRA and collaborating agencies. Further, <br />given the magnitude of potential impacts from the proposed project, efforts should be taken to <br />arrange a FRA workshop in the Region for local governments and others to fully understand the <br />process and methods by which public comments will be received and evaluated. <br />These issues have also been communicated in correspondence to Governor Scott, the Treasure <br />Coast Legislative Delegation, and the Treasure Coast Congressional Delegation. This <br />correspondence is attached. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.