My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/22/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
04/22/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:38:00 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/22/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
153
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004BG.tif
SmeadsoftID
14195
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Maureen Gelfo <br />From: Vincent Burke <vburke@ircgov.com> <br />Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 3:23 PM <br />To: Maureen Gelfo <br />Cc: Audrey Obertautsch; Arjuna Weragoda <br />Subject: FW: Today's BOCC Meeting <br />For CDM Work Order #11 as approved in the Board Meeting of April 22, 2014 for item 12.G.1 <br />From: Grimaldi, Jill[mailto:GrimaldiJT@cdmsmith.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:39 PM <br />To: Vincent Burke <br />Cc: Grotke, Eric <br />Subject: Today's BOCC Meeting <br />Vinny, <br />I just wanted to follow up with you and confirm what we agreed to at today's BOCC meeting. First, I do not think there <br />will be any problem in considering the IRFWCD canals as potential sources. We can copy David Gunther on the data <br />request and see what they have available for his district, just as we will with the Sebastian River Improvement District. <br />Since actual quantification of supply won't be done until the modeling in Phase 2, we will limit the Phase 1 inclusion to <br />coordination, discussions on potential available flow and conceptual options for redirecting flow to the potential site or <br />sites. <br />Second, we have already included an item under reservoir sizing task on page A-2 of the scope of services to consider <br />the Ag demand in sizing the reservoir. We proposed to size it for just the utility needs (potable) and the utility plus ag <br />needs. The caveat here is that we do not have adequate budget to prepare the demand numbers for the ag users. We <br />will have to rely on the agricultural folks to provide their estimate of need coupled with what the SJRWMD has available <br />in the regional water supply plan. <br />Lastly, Commissioner Solari voiced his desire for us to get through Phase 1 as quickly as possible. We included 120 days <br />in the scope, but will do our absolute best to condense the schedule and attempt to deliver the final addendum within <br />90 days of the Notice to Proceed. This will require quick turnaround on data needs as well as timely reviews by all parties <br />involved when we distribute documents. <br />Please let me know if you have any other questions or comments. <br />Jill <br />Jill T. Grimaldi, BCES I Principal Scientist 1 CDM Smith 1 1701 Highway A1A, Suite 301 I Vero Beach, FL 32963 I T: 772.231.4301 I F: <br />772.231.4332 I D: 772.360.3224 I M: 772.519.0660 I cdmsmith.com <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.