Laserfiche WebLink
. 2013 Tindale -Oliver hired to conduct update of <br />all 9 impact fees (data, costs, credits) <br />. Provide alternatives for reducing non- <br />residential impact fees while maintaining LOS <br />and minimizing/ avoiding residential impact fee <br />increases <br />. Tindale -Oliver issued January 2014 initial report <br />and draft fee schedule <br />General Methodology <br />E Consumption -based fee calculated (same <br />methodology since inception) <br />E Affordable Growth methodology applied to <br />calculated fee (reduced most fees) <br />El Staff scenario recommendations appliedto 4 <br />fee program areas: <br />Emergency Services <br />Public Buildings <br />Parks and Recreation <br />Libraries <br />4/2,3/2014 <br />• January 22°a public workshop held <br />• Updated impact fee data, variables <br />(demands, costs, credits), and calculations <br />presented <br />• Affordable Growth methodology <br />explained, staff scenario discussed <br />• BCC generally accepted update and <br />methodology <br />Instructed staff to conduct on-the-road- <br />workshops <br />nthe-road- <br />workshops (methodology and results) <br />10 <br />E Affordable Growth Methodology <br />• Based on projected future growthrate & available <br />funding <br />• Includes buy -down (subsidy) options <br />• Can be targeted to reduce non-residential impact <br />fees based on policy to stimulate economic <br />development <br />