Laserfiche WebLink
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />MEMORAND UM <br />TO: Dylan Reingold <br />County Attorney <br />i <br />TIIROUCII: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Community Development Director <br />FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICf14.t'" <br />Chief, Pnvironmental Planning <br />& Code Enforcement Section <br />Scott McAdam, CBO, Mc "P ; <br />Building Official 11 <br />DATE: March 17, 2014 <br />RE: County Condemnation Demolitions and Public Nuisance Abatement Cases (2009 -Present) <br />Regarding the proposed nuisance abatement special assessment ordinance to be considered for adoption by the <br />Board of County Commissioners, please note the following information relating to County condemnation <br />demolitions and public nuisance abatement cases since 2009. <br />This infomiation is provided to give a perspective on the amount of demolitions/nuisance abatements that have <br />occurred over the past five years, including a comparison of total costs and recovered costs. Also provtded are <br />some statistics with respect to overgrown weed public nuisance complaints and related enforcement actions <br />that have occurred since 2009. <br />Condemnation demolitions (unincorporated county 2009 -present) <br />• All funds from the MSTU <br />e Number of structures demolished due to condemnation- 34 <br />• Total Fees paid to contractors - $173,490.15 <br />• Recovered Fees - $28,294.55 (approximately 16%) <br />County abatement of public nuisances other than demo;itzons (unincorporated county 2009 -present) <br />Aside from demolition of condemned structures, there are two instances where the County proceeded with <br />abatement of public nuisances and assessment of costs over the past five years: <br />C;1UseralrolandlDesktap\Naisanse abatement 5 -yr history memo 3-14-14.doc <br />ATTACHMENT 2 <br />51 <br />