Laserfiche WebLink
March 11, 2014 Board of County Commission meeting where the Board <br /> of County Commissioners authorized bifurcating non-residential and <br /> residential fee changes; and (3) highlighted the April 22, 2014 Board of <br /> County Commission meeting where the Board adopted an updated <br /> schedule for non-residential fees and accepted the consultant's report/ <br /> study that supported the non-residential fees. <br /> Director Boling reported that on June 6, 2014, the consultant issued a <br /> final report,which includes residential and education impact fees. <br /> If there is a consensus after this meeting to move forward with a <br /> residential fee update, staff will bring it to the July 15, 2014 Board of <br /> County Commission meeting, and if there are other tasks, it would <br /> probably be sometime in September. <br /> He requested Board input and consensus on implementation issues so <br /> staff can move forward. <br /> B. Consultant Presentation on Residential Fees (Including School Impact Fees) <br /> and Implementation Issues <br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> 1:37 Associate Principal Nilgun Kamp gave a presentation on the findings of <br /> p.m. the technical study, which focused on residential impact fees, school <br /> impact fee calculations, and implementation issues. She clarified the <br /> consumption-based methodology, affordable growth strategy, <br /> residential land uses maximum calculated fees, and residential land uses <br /> affordable growth fees. She also elaborated on staffs recommendation <br /> to use the affordable growth strategy with the changes to include the <br /> library impact fee suspension, cutting the affordable growth strategy by <br /> 50% for public buildings, adopting parks impact fee at 75% of the <br /> affordable growth strategy, and adopting full fee for emergency <br /> services. She said the two new land uses were: (1) single family less than <br /> 1,000 square feet, and (2) high cube automated warehouse. <br /> Ms. Kamp also spoke about the educational facilities impact fee, <br /> facilities built since 2005, ongoing/future projects, the impact fee <br /> methodology, and the educational facilities which included the total <br /> school facility cost per student station (about $33,000), credit <br /> components, and the net impact cost per student (about $24,114), the <br /> student generation rate total (about 0.210), and the calculated school <br /> impact fee schedule which results in a fee of$2,387 for multi-family and <br /> $6,077 for single family. <br /> Ms. Kamp thereafter described the affordable growth scenario (annual <br /> growth rate estimate of 28%), and the residential fee comparison where <br /> the affordable growth fee for single family would go from $1,756 to <br /> $1,702,multi-family$500 to $668, and mobile home $623 to $1,026. <br /> Impact Fee Update Study Workshop Page 2 <br />