My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/11/2014 ImpactFee
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
06/11/2014 ImpactFee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2018 1:08:42 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:39:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Work Shop Impact Fee
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/11/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
112-0015-R
Book and Page
8
Subject
Impact Fee Update Study
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL000009\S0003P6.tif
SmeadsoftID
13467
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Director Boling requested leaving the residential fees as they are now, <br /> and scheduling the new residential fee change after the School Board <br /> holds its workshop,which will probably be in September. <br /> 5:35 Mr. Wilson continued his presentation by naming some of the issues <br /> p.m. that he felt could be dismissed, and the issues he wanted staff to review, <br /> such as Emergency Services and Law Enforcement. He did not support <br /> an increase in impact fees and felt the current level was adequate. Using <br /> an overhead projector, he provided information regarding the level of <br /> service and affordable growth for parks and public buildings, then <br /> emphasized that impact fees are not a tax, they are a fee. He thereafter <br /> spoke about the affordable alternative method, the administration of an <br /> impact fee, and the refund policy. <br /> Chairman O'Bryan explained the law for collecting impact fees. <br /> Director Boling reiterated that the consultants established the park fee, <br /> which has always been value or asset based. <br /> Vice Chairman Davis wanted to know what public building space would <br /> be needed in the next six years, and Administrator Baird responded that <br /> it will be the Courthouse and Sheriffs Department. <br /> 5. WRAP-UP <br /> 6:08 Chairman O'Bryan clarified Commissioner Solari's direction for staff: <br /> p.m. (1) Eliminate the less than 1,000 square-foot category, or keep it the <br /> same (0 to 1,500 square feet). <br /> (2) Review individual assessment and appeals for a reasonable fee. <br /> (3) Leave portability, but drop the refunds regarding non- <br /> commencement refunds. <br /> (4) Continue collections at permit issuance. <br /> Commissioner Zorc voiced concerns over the alternative method appeal <br /> process for businesses that enclose their structures. <br /> 6:10 Discussion ensued regarding enclosures, interpretation of the Code, the <br /> p.m. amount of the fee, the appeals process, dropping the 1,000 square-foot <br /> category, eliminating the refund fee for non-commencement, and <br /> collecting impact fees at permit issuance. <br /> Chairman O'Bryan reiterated staffs direction to continue collecting <br /> residential impact fees at the current rate, and after the School Board's <br /> workshop, scheduling the final public hearing so the Board can take <br /> final action on the fee schedule. <br /> The Commissioners confirmed for Director Boling, that they support <br /> Impact Fee Update Study Workshop Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.