My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/19/2014
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
08/19/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 5:44:05 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:19:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
08/19/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
291
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000L\S000609.tif
SmeadsoftID
14729
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Reconnection/Water Farming August 2014 <br />Page 4 <br />3. GROUND WATER STABILIZATION/RE-CHARGE <br />In conjunction with the attributes of the improved surface water storage capability for the region, <br />comes the closely linked benefit of improving ground water stabilization /re -charge and <br />potentially reducing the long and short term effects of continual withdrawals from Surficial and <br />the Upper Floridian Aquifer systems. <br />4. FLOOD CONTROL <br />The concept of flood -control through storage is a proven and effective flood control mechanism. <br />Opponents of Flood Control by Diversion will note that methodology of diversion is wasteful of <br />freshwater resources; causes serious economic damage to coastal communities ; harmful to <br />marine life; harmful to the recreational attributes of the lagoon and the associated tourist trade <br />and will promote flood control by storage as necessary to the public interest. <br />The initial thoughts in proposing this idea was a targeted volume reduction of 100,000 acre-feet. <br />In a cursory review of the area in question and a working knowledge of the basins in general, this <br />did seem to be an attainable number and one that would support the economic investment. <br />While the thought process would support the ideal that any amount of stormwater reduction into <br />the lagoon system was a worthwhile endeavor, reality moved that the volume reduction had to <br />be of some significance to make a difference and to attract the interest of the Agencies who <br />would be called upon to support this idea, both in words and in financial support. Those in <br />attendance during these discussions were urged and cautioned that time was of essence as <br />speculation was that while the current market rate for agricultural lands was hovering in the $5- <br />6,000 per acre range, there were already market indications these approximate per acre land <br />values could double in a short time. <br />The time period was 2001-2002. <br />THE HISTORY OF THE RECOMMENDED RE -CONNECTION <br />The roots of the recommended re -connection can be traced to the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and <br />1954, whereby the project/ area for this re -connection consideration was authorized by the United <br />States Congress. This Congressionally authorized project called for the construction of a series <br />of inter -connected reservoirs of which the largest was named the Indian River -St. Lucie County <br />reservoir. These reservoirs as planned in these earlier flood control acts were to be located in <br />the western portions of Indian River and St. Lucie Counties, essentially in the same geographical <br />area as the current recommended re -connection project. <br />The earlier supporting studies and documentation associated with the authorized plans identified <br />historic natural flow patterns which mimic to a large extent the present day SFWMD and <br />SJRWMD canal and levee systems. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.