01/13/2015AP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

other NEPs, which was never presented to the subcommittee. The minutes of the meeting show that the subcommittee was given six specific duties: a. Create structure of NEP b. Determine Policy Board Members c. Consider Management Board Members. d. Draft Inter-local agreement. e. Draft Mission statement f. Determine appropriate funding level for NEP. 3. August 18, 2014 — First meeting of subcommittee. Before the meeting an inter-local agreement was drafted by staff for discussion, with no subcommittee input and sent to the Subcommittee members. Minutes of the meeting suggest that the subcommittee began by discussing the draft agreement. This is false. It was a two- hour meeting and the first hour was basically me asking multiple foundation questions and asking for the response to be in writing. The questions were basically sidestepped and there was never a written response from staff. The subcommittee did not address five of the six duties charged to us by the Advisory Board, Interestingly, during the discussion the subcommittee was told that "The Governor spoke with DEP" and was told to make it more locally responsive, that it was to be a "locally driven program at the grass roots level". The IRL-NEP Interim Director Maurice Sterling said at the meeting: "Your Advisory Board voted unanimously to move the Tampa Bay model." I recall no such vote, the minutes reflect no such vote, and the statement is contradicted by the fact that the minutes clearly show that the AB charged the subcommittee to "Create structure of the NEP". The subcommittee did discuss, during the review of the staff drafted inter- local agreement, one of the six duties that it was given. It discussed the Policy Board Members that staff had presented in the draft. I said that the three agencies listed, FDEP, the SJRWMD and SFWMD should not be voting Board members. Henry Dean an advisor to the SJRWMD responded saying; "I can say with some assurance...they need a voice..." if they are to contribute such a "substantial number of their ad valorem dollars". He then made a stronger statement: "Neither department nor two districts will participate if they are not voting members." This statement persuaded the subcommittee to leave the agencies as voting members of the Policy Board. However, a subsequent public information request shows Mr. Dean's statements to be false. The minutes of the September 9, 2014 Governing Board meeting of the SJWMD, which authorized "the Executive Director or