02/10/2015 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Dr. Thomas Gillman Dr. Walter Forman Dr. Mlles Conway White Surf Subdivision Lot 3 White Surf Subdivision Lot 2 Kansas City Colony Lot 18 Indian River County Indian River County Indian River County Commissioner Peter O'Bryan Board of County Commissioners 180127`" Street, Building A Vero Beach, FI 32960. State Representative Debbie Mayfield Florida House of Representatives 1053 20th Place Vero Beach, FL 32960. September 8, 2014. Request for Information/Answers to Indian River Countv's Official Position and Intent to enforce existing Codes and Reeulations in the White Surf Subdivision and surroundine Ocean Front orooertv in the context of Florida CS/HB 307 Bill Passed Into Law on July 1.2014: Dear Commissioner O'Bryan: The above property owners and residents of Indian River County have resorted to corresponding with your office to obtain Information and answers to previously submitted questions and information requests to IRC staff that have unfortunately not been forthcoming. A summary of these previously submitted questions and information requests are as follows: (1) Code Enforcement Board (CEB) Order 2014030066; (a) Photographic evidence of violations of the above order occurring on 8/2, 8/9, 8/16 and 8/23/14 was submitted to staff via email on 8/18, 8/25 and 8/29/2014. A number of questions related to how many (if any) counts would be prosecuted before the CEB and the request of the above residents to again testify before the CEB in light of the plight of Mr. Deblois not being afforded litigation attorney support at the CEB hearing were submitted. Mr. Deblois is a code enforcement administrator, not a litigation or anv other attornev and as such needs the CEB attorney or the County attorney to provide staff with proper legal support and argument at the forthcoming hearing. The respondent's attorney will again attempt to circumvent and or obfuscate the intent of Section 911.15(4)B namely that the visitor exemptlon/preclusion to the code Is intended to apply to visitors of the orooerty owner when In residence W to apply to the visitors of the daily fee paying transient renters of the property while the owner lives and works In China. Should IRC or the CEB legal staff not "step up to the plate" and support Mr. Deblois in applying the proper intent of Section 911.15(4)B then the respondent's attorney will be successful in 'gaming the system', for under their argument all vehicles narked at this commercial business operating on the doorsteps of bona fide single family residences should be precluded/exempted from Section 911.15(4)B as every single car parking there at the moment is a visitor — the daily fee paying transients, their transient visitors and the commercial business/workers supporting the transients. It is for the above and other reasons, the undersigned residents requested a response to their written email questions, as absent lack of IRC attorney support, the undersigned will step into the void and make said argument In support of Mr. Deblois. Commissioner O'Bryan ....._ _.._. _ Page 1 307