Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 2 <br />Code Enforcement Board of Indian River County <br />ORDER FINDING VIOLATION <br />IN THE MATTER OF: <br />MITCHELL D. DUDEK <br />C/O SHARON A. KRAMER <br />3 ROYAL PALM POINTE PH -E <br />VERO BEACH, FL 32960 <br />MITCHELL D. DUDEK <br />C/O BARRY G. SEGAL, P.A. <br />3096 CARDINAL DRIVE, STE. 2C <br />VERO BEACH, FL 32963 <br />, Respondent <br />Case No. 2014030066 <br />RE: VIOLATION OF SECTION 911.15(4)B, of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida. <br />DESCRIPTION OF SITE OF VIOLATION: <br />Location: 2400 23RD ST SE VERO BEACH <br />Tax Parcel ID No.: 33-40-34-00002-0000-00001.0 <br />Zoning: RS -3 <br />Legal Description: LOT 1, WHITE SURF SUB, PBI 10-6 <br />THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD HAS HEARD TESTIMONYAND EXAMINED EVIDENCE ATA <br />HEARING HELD JULY 28, 2014, AND BASED ON THE EVIDENCE, THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD HAS <br />ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS: <br />FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW <br />l) Respondent is the legal owner and/or occupant of the subject property, and was duly notified of the hearing, in <br />accordance with Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. The following respondent representatives were present at the July 28, <br />2014 Code Enforcement Board meeting: <br />Barry G. Segal (attorney for Respondent) and Sharon Kramer <br />2) The subject property is zoned RS -3 District. As of 6/25/2014, on the property existed the following violation: <br />- VEHICLE PARKING /STORAGE VIOLATION (RESIDENTIAL) [unenclosed parking in a required yard <br />area] <br />3) The above described is a violation of the following Section of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River <br />County: <br />Code Chanter/ Section <br />- CHP 911 / 911.15(4)B <br />4) At the hearing, the Board heard testimony, received evidence, and concluded that a violation of the cited section had <br />occurred on the subject property relating to parking in a required yard area, although the Respondent was in compliance <br />at the time of the hearing. The Board voted to adopt a continuing order to impose a fine if a violation of the cited code <br />section recurs. The Board also heard testimony and received evidence relating to an alleged stormwater drainage <br />violation (in violation of County Code Section 930.05) and alleged unenclosed parking on a single-family zoned lot in <br />excess of limitations set forth in County Code Section 911.15(4)B. On those two allegations, the Board made no finding <br />of violation. <br />310 <br />