My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/22/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
5/22/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:03:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/22/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY 2 21990 BOOK 80 PnE 156 <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if this is applicable to manage- <br />ment employees as well, and Administrator Chandler advised that <br />those who aren't included are himself, the County Attorney, and <br />the Fire District personnel. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that one of his concerns is that <br />50 of $100,000 is a lot more than 50 of $10,000, and, therefore, <br />those who are paid higher move ahead faster and it widens the <br />spread. <br />Administrator Chandler emphasized that is why he is trying <br />to differentiate between a progression plan and an annual adjust- <br />ment, which picks up the entire range and is aimed more at <br />keeping us competitive. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked how long it takes to get from <br />the bottom to the top of the range under the proposed plan. <br />Administrator Chandler stated 6 to 7 years. Generally in <br />most structured plans, you get to the top in 4115 years. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know how this fits in with <br />the County Attorney who has a contractual relationship, and the <br />Administrator explained that this plan would not be appl.icable to <br />him or the County Attorney as they both have contracts. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that we pay our administrative <br />people pretty well and have made a concentrated effort to do so, <br />and when you look at the department head level, you don't see the <br />same kind of turn -over. Most of them have been here quite a few <br />years, and they would get a considerable increase while a mid <br />range would not get much, which concerns him. <br />Administrator Chandler advised that if you are going to look <br />at a differential for our management employees, you should look <br />at that at the time of the annual adjustment when you are looking <br />at the competitiveness of your ranges. He agreed that we have <br />not had turn over in the department heads, but noted that we have <br />had some difficulty in recruiting management level employees <br />where you are competing for various type engineers and semi- <br />professionals and must compete with a much larger market area. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.