My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/19/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
6/19/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:07:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/19/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fr - <br />JUN 191990 <br />BOOK- � PAGE 44 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0, <br />Commissioner Scurlock being absent) approved the <br />Developer's Agreement with Copeland Landing, Inc., as <br />recommended by staff. <br />AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />HEDIN MARGINAL_ ACCESS EASEMENT_ ESCROW AGREEMENT <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/12/90: <br />TO: The Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM:t75 William G. Collins II - Assistant County Attorney <br />DATE: June 12, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Hedin Marginal Access Easement Escrow Agreement <br />Indian River County has approved a special exception and <br />site plan for oil lube and mini -storage facility at U. S. 1 <br />and 99th Street. A condition of the site plan approval was <br />a conveyance to the County of a marginal access easement as <br />required by Section 23.3(d)(10)(d) of the County Zoning <br />Code. Mr. Hedin Is proposing to contest the legality of the <br />dedication requirement unless the County Land Development <br />Regulations are revised to provide for a traffic impact fee <br />credit for such marginal access easement dedications. <br />Further,. Mr. Hedin wishes to proceed with the development of <br />this site prior to the outcome of Land Development <br />Regulation revisions and potential litigation. <br />In the past, the Board of County Commissioners has approved <br />the escrow of deeds for property which are the subject of <br />�,..,;.. <br />litigation over the legality of the dedication requirement. <br />This is a very prudent approach. In the event the <br />regulation is held illegal, there would be no temporary <br />' <br />taking damages owed by the County, since the development has <br />been allowed to proceed normally. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Confirm that it is still the Board's position to allow <br />escrow of deeds and easements which are the subject of <br />litigation, so as to avoid any temporary taking damages <br />accruing to the County. <br />22 <br />777 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.