Laserfiche WebLink
� � r <br />Mr. Halback explained that in this Concept, they have taken <br />the lands Mr. Flick controls that he has suggested may be <br />available. <br />Chairman Eggert believed this involves half of Block 46, <br />half of Block 45, and the back half of Block 44, and Mr. Halback <br />agreed. <br />Mr. Halback continued that, to compare apples to apples, <br />they have taken the building configuration shown on the Base <br />Plan, which is a building that provides you with 103,000 sq. ft., <br />plus the ability to expand to 130,000 sq, ft. The other thing <br />they looked at was the parking that was lost, which is part of <br />the parking that is back of the bank that Mr. Flick has his <br />office in and a small portion that is City owned. They removed <br />that and closed 15th Avenue and located the building directly on <br />that access. Mr. Halback still felt that we have met the same <br />City parking requirements of 515 spaces and noted that they have <br />replaced the parking that is disrupted by putting the building on <br />those particular properties where there are approximately 60 <br />parking spaces. In looking at the configuration of the property <br />Mr. Flick had shown for a parking garage, Mr. Halback felt <br />comfortable that you can get a 5 level parking garage within the <br />50' height restriction and 450 spaces within that garage. He <br />advised that they have replaced the deficit caused by losing 60 <br />spaces of surface parking by going across the street and putting <br />in a surface parking lot of approximately 44 spaces: This <br />scenario eliminates the State Attorney's office and the 2 houses <br />to the back. The final cost estimate for this concept based on <br />Mr. Flick's land cost figures is 18.9 million. <br />Mr. Halback next presented Concept G, Option B, as follows: <br />25 <br />JUL 101990 <br />� i <br />