My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/10/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
7/10/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:45 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:10:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/10/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Courthouse, it affects your eyes, your throat, etc. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know who is removed under <br />Concept G, Option A, and Mr. Halback clarified that concept <br />proposes to use all the property Mr. Flick already owns or has <br />options on, except for one small piece of property owned by the <br />Bracketts and it is mostly vacant. <br />Chairman Eggert believed Concept G/A does not affect the <br />Jackson and Clem buildings nor the Vero Beach Printing Company <br />building. <br />Further discussion ensued as to the Base Plan being 17.8 <br />million versus 18.9 for Concept G, Option A, without taking into <br />account the value of existing structures. Commissioner Scurlock <br />estimated that the Annex, which has about 14,000 sq. ft., figured <br />at $50 per sq. ft., would represent a value of about $700,000, <br />and the old Courthouse, with about 20,000 sq ft. at possibly $30 <br />per sq. ft., would represent a value of about $600,000, which <br />adds up to more than a million dollars. He personally liked <br />Concept G/A. <br />Commissioner Bird commented that he likes that concept, too, <br />and would like to see if Mr. Flick or Mr. Schlitt have any ideas <br />about how it can be done for even less than that going with this <br />option. He stressed that although he realizes this is not a <br />popular view, he still is not 100% convinced we should put all <br />our eggs in one basket, and if we go with Concept G/A and save <br />the existing Courthouse and Annex, he felt there are some <br />government functions, Clerk or whatever, that can take place in <br />those buildings. He is not convinced the Public Defender or <br />State's Attorney and various other functions all need their <br />offices within the judicial complex itself. <br />Discussion continued re various options for use of that <br />space, with Commissioner Bird contending that unless things <br />really turn around in the downtown marketplace, we really should <br />be thinking about using the Courthouse for government purposes. <br />31 <br />JUL 101990 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.