Laserfiche WebLink
rC <br />OTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, that the Board not approve the <br />the payment by the County of a 10% real estate <br />'I <br />commission, as recommended by staff. <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Bird felt the Board's <br />direction to staff on this matter at the meeting of June 5th was <br />rather confusing. He had gone back and listened to the tape of <br />that meeting when we agreed to buy that property. Mr. Luther was <br />up at the podium and the Motion was to agree for the County to <br />buy the property, and Mr. Luther made the comment, "including the <br />11%", which was the 10% real estate commission and 1% closing <br />costs. At that point, Commissioner Scurlock said, "That's my <br />Motion.", and we all voted on it and it passed. It was on the <br />tape and we did agree to pay 11% as our share of the closing <br />costs. <br />Administrator Chandler explained that Public Works Director <br />Jim Davis wanted to bring it back to check to see if that was <br />clearly the Commission's intent, because ordinarily on something <br />like this, we wouldn't be involved in payment of the realtor's <br />fees. <br />Commissioner Scurlock realized that he stated that was his <br />Motion, but he clearly understood that he was moving not to pay <br />the 10% real estate commission, which was staff's recommendation, <br />and still is. He has not changedhis mind and his Motion today is <br />the same, not to pay the real estate commission. <br />Chairman Eggert believed this was a family thing, and it <br />never occurred to her that we would be paying the real estate <br />commission. <br />Commissioner Bird explained that supposedly there is a <br />listing agreement on the property, and the property was brought <br />to Director Davis' attention by Tom Schlitt, representing the <br />property owner. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt that since it is clearly on the <br />record, we shouldn't go back on it. <br />49 <br />