Laserfiche WebLink
could survive that test. If the marginal access road provides <br />some capacity relief to the arterial, why would it not be <br />eligible for some partial impact fee credit. His feeling is that <br />we would have a very difficult time prevailing in court on this, <br />but staff is very insistent on this requirement. <br />Director Keating noted that this is one of the things that <br />the Chamber of Commerce supports, and the DOT identified this as <br />a suggested mechanism to reduce curb cuts. <br />Attorney Collins pointed out that he is not saying this <br />requirement is not a good idea - just that he does not think we <br />can defend it. <br />Public Works Director Davis noted that another alternative <br />is to identify where we want to have these roads and fund them by <br />special assessment. <br />Debate continued, and Attorney Vitunac felt we should just <br />go to court and see if we win or lose. He noted that Attorney <br />Collins just wants you to know his feelings now. <br />Chairman Eggert suggested that since it is now past 5 <br />o'clock, that the Attorneys and staff work this out. <br />Chapter 955 - Moving of Structures. Staff advised that <br />there are no changes from the existing ordinance, only format <br />changes. <br />There were no comments on this chapter. <br />There being no further business, on Motion duly made, <br />seconded and carried, the.*Board adjourned at 5:10 o'clock P.M. <br />ATTEST: <br />Clerk <br />5� wo 'wine <br />�. <br />A V X71 0 9 990 63 <br />Oia9fo� -J <br />