8/14/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r AUG 141990 willing seller, or Concept M, which provides you the greatest flexibility for approximately $800/900,000 more. Commissioner Wheeler believed Some question was raised as to ingress and egress in Concept J, but Administrator Chandler advised that it has been indicated this is not a problem. Commissioner Bird noted that basically the difference between these is the additional parking, and he felt we are kidding ourselves if we think the tenants to the east are going to be happy about sharing that parking. Mr. Halback agreed and felt the only way you could possibiy make that parking lot work would be with a gate of some type. Discussion continued regarding parking, and Administrator Chandler pointed out that from a practical standpoint, we will not be at maximum utilization of those parking spaces for a number of years down the road. Mr. Halback agreed totally and commented that he would suggest that the only problem with Concept J is that of all the schemes, it is the tightest on its relationship of short term parking to long term parking. He noted that people who park there for the whole day most likely will use the parking garage. Commissioner Bird noted that the other related item is selection of appraisers and asked if those appraisals will include the properties in any of these 4 scenarios. Administrator Chandler advised that the appraisals will include all the property under Mr. Flick's control plus the block with the print shop, and now staff is suggesting including the 6 lots on the front of the parking garage. He stressed that before we get into too much detailed discussion with the property owners, we would like to have those appraisals in. If the Commission has a definite preference for a certain concept, that would have an effect, but any of these concepts will meet the parking requirements. Commissioner Scurlock personally felt that the bottom line of the whole thing is flexibility, and, theretore, Concept M is 23