Laserfiche WebLink
SEWER FORCE MAIN WEST SIDE U.S.#1 (10TH TO 4TH STS.) ASSESSMENT <br />RESOLUTIONS 1 AND 2. <br />The Board reviewed the following memo from Engineer McCain <br />of the Utilities Department: <br />DATE: AUGUST 16, 1990 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />PREPARED WILLIAM F. MICA <br />AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJ S ANG EER <br />BY: DEPARTMENT OF Y SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: SEWER FORCE MAIN, WEST SIDE OF U.S. #1 FROM <br />10TH TO 4TH STREETS <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -88 -22 -CCS <br />ASSESSMENT RESOLUTIONS 1 AND 2 <br />BACKGROUND <br />The staff of the Department of Utility Services originally brought <br />Resolutions 1 and 2 for this project to the Board of County <br />Commissioners on May 1, 1990. Since that time, the project was put <br />out to bid. The bids all came in too high and were subsequently <br />rejected. The project was put on hold. To compound problems, <br />several necessary easements were unobtainable. Due to these <br />obstacles, the project has now been redesigned, a revised assessment <br />has been prepared, and we are bringing revised Resolutions 1 and 2. <br />to the Board for approval. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The Resolutions currently being brought to the Board will supersede <br />the original Resolutions (90-53 and 90-54). The total cost to be <br />assessed on a square footage basis is $97,125.00. This cost covers <br />the force main construction cost and the engineering fee. The total <br />square footage is 460,616.0 square feet, which equates to <br />0.210858937 dollars per square foot. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the <br />Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Resolutions, and <br />set the date for the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that as he commented earlier, <br />Item 6E on the Consent Agenda seems to be the same.as this item, <br />but actually it simply cancels the original bid for the reasons <br />explained in the above memo. <br />A U � 9. R 1990 BOOK 81. PAGE �a <br />