Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
r � <br />SEP 111990 8.1 ��,ci ; <br />Director Keating advised that we also worked on the native <br />upland vegetation set aside rule. When we went to Tallahassee <br />we originally proposed acquisition Qf 300 acres of pine flatwoods <br />9 <br />to accommodate the concern of the TCRPC, and staff again crunched <br />numbers and determined how much native upland land was likely to <br />be impacted through development over the 20 year period; what we <br />would get through our 15% and 10% requirement; and what the <br />difference is given the RPC's 250. We took into consideration <br />that our Plan mandates us to acquire at least 50 acres, and then <br />we indicated we would acquire an additional amount of acreage to <br />come up to the difference between the 25% and the 15/100. Our <br />Plan indicates we are going to acquire various amounts of <br />endangered and threatened land over this period, but we don't <br />have a specific number. This is just going to require us to put <br />a number in there for total native land acquisition. <br />Chairman Eggert informed the Board that -what they also took <br />up to Tallahassee was the possibility of changing the AG west of <br />Blue Cypress to 1 units per 20 acres. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed one element in the Comprehen- <br />sive Plan is affordable housing, and he asked how you provide for <br />affordable housing when they make the pool of land available for <br />development smaller which drives the cost of the land up. <br />Director Keating noted that two things comes into play. <br />Even with the 4.5 factor, it still indicates we have enough units <br />allocated in the urban service area to accommodate our needs for <br />the next 90 years; so, they believe the market hasn't been <br />tightened enough to drive the price up substantially. He <br />continued that they were reluctant to have us reduce any of the <br />higher densities we have in here now. When we were talking about <br />reducing the 8 upa density along the SR60 corridor or the 10 upa <br />south of the City, they were looking at that as places where <br />affordable housing could be accommodated. <br />Administrator Chandler commented that they came in with a <br />map that is substantially different than we see here, but the <br />8 <br />M <br />