My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/11/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
9/11/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:43:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/11/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fr - <br />S E P <br />111990 <br />Commissioner <br />Bird stressed that he hated to see <br />our <br />utilities service plan restricted to the confines of these lines <br />for the next 20 years, but he wondered just how difficult it wi'II <br />be to amend the Plan and change those lines to provide service to <br />some of these non -service areas. <br />Director Keating felt it will be very difficult because to <br />amend the Plan, you have to justify it even more. He explained <br />to the Board that essentially the plan the DCA staff took to <br />Pelham and that he rejected, is the same plan they essentially <br />agreed to and more enthusiastically yesterday when we provided <br />the different numbers, the one change being the 1/20 in the west <br />county. He further informed the Board that every county, other <br />than Charlotte, has gone the compliance agreement route, and <br />Charlotte lost in the administrative hearing. St. Lucie and <br />Martin Counties are close to getting compliance agreements, and <br />their ratios are much lower than ours. <br />Administrator Chandler believed the frustration the <br />Commissioners have expressed is the same as staff has faced, and <br />it came to the point where staff felt the line has to be drawn <br />somewhere. He confirmed that we presented practically the same <br />map we presented before but we did net out lakes, roads, <br />churches, parks, etc. We also included the Highlands in an <br />attempt to show what is actually there in reality. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if anyone raised a question of <br />having any kind of density credits for someone willing to give <br />you effluent disposal above and beyond what is required for his <br />property, and Director Keating advised that was not discussed, <br />but he did not think the DCA would have a problem with that type <br />of initiative. <br />Commissioner Bird stressed that the area giving him the most <br />concern is the area east of 1-95 and the undeveloped property <br />there. A lot of it is in producing citrus groves, but a lot of <br />it isn't, and he is afraid we are really painting those people in <br />a corner. Even though that property may be undeveloped, a lot of <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.