9/11/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FF - S -E P 111990 Cl.nter 910, Concurrency Management System New chapter reflecting state requirements 9 ' Director Keating noted that this chapter probably has more impact than any new chapter. He advised that we need to make some change in the way we have the drainage concurrency require- ments right now because we have in there that the Engineering Department is going to require more information and look at more criteria than is really necessary, and he would like authoriza- tion to change this so that not as much information has to be provided upfront to the Engineering Department. He explained that we will focus just on the two principle LOS criteria that will affect new development - the discharge rate for the Basin or watershed, and also the flood protection elevation requirement for single family. .. Board members indicated they were happy to authorize such a change. Commissioner Scurlock inquired why on Page 31 we changed from 1% to 50, and Planner Rohani explained that the change is from 10 of peak hour, peak season, peak direction traffic to 5% of the average daily traffic. Talmage Rogers came before the Board representing the Council of 100 and the Chamber of Commerce. He noted that they have followed this chapter through its development and agree with its importance, and they do applaud the change in the draft in which the total number of days for the review time element dropped from 28 to 23. They still have three concerns, however. (1) In their opinion the evaluating agencies are not required to explain what the deficiencies are and by how much the demand exceeds the supply in terms of the applicant. Mr. Rogers felt a paragraph could be added in Section 910.07 as 3 (c) to assure that the applicant is always informed of his deficiency and the amount thereof. 24 FL]