Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 2 6 1990 80oK 81 F,AGE 54 d <br />came before the Board and asked that a nodal concept be adopted <br />at the interchanges of 1-95 at SR -60 and CR -512. They asked that <br />the Board take a radius of some 3 -miles at SR -60 and establish a <br />node for 1 upa residential golf course type development, and a <br />radius of 2 -miles at'l-95 and CR -512 for the same type of <br />development. He remembered that the Board directed staff to <br />look into the nodal concept for these interchanges on 1-95, but <br />they don't seem to be included in the compliance agreement. He <br />represents clients in both of these areas who wish to build golf <br />course residential with 1800 acres at CR -512 and 500+ acres at <br />SR -60. Back in July they submitted an amendment to the Comp Plan <br />for the property on SR -60 that would bring the urban service area <br />into compliance with the utility -service area. The utilities <br />service area in the Comp Plan included about 120 acres of <br />agricultural which was left out of the urban service area. The <br />Planned Development that was developed came very close to <br />satisfying the nodal concept that they were looking for at SR -60 <br />except for the agricultural requirement. He was afraid it will <br />leave the agricultural set aside in that 120 acres of the 500+ <br />acre parcel at SR -60. Mr. McQueen asked if the Board still has <br />the option of passing this agreement tonight and including that <br />amendment since they had voted to have those nodes in_,the first <br />place. He recalled that at a Commission meeting some 4 or 5 <br />weeks ago, the Commission reaffirmed their direction to staff to <br />negotiate with the DCA to keep these nodes in there as best they <br />could. <br />Chairman Eggert stressed that staff did take them up to <br />Tallahassee and they did fight for them. <br />Mr. McQueen felt that the County still may have the option <br />of passing this agreement with an addendum to it to let the DCA <br />consider the node without jeopardizing its position, because if <br />they do not consider the node, they conceivably could strike that <br />node out and say that they would just accept the other and will <br />not accept it. <br />18 <br />W <br />