9/26/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Director Keating explained that we are only dealing with the compliance agreement issues that are here now. However, when we come back and amend the plan to incorporate those, that is when we would consider these other amendments, along with the amendments that were submitted in July. He needed to have Mr. McQueen and Mr. Barkett get their applications in real soon, but Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that Mr. Barkett doesn't need to because they have intervened. Director Keating felt that both Mr. Barkett's project and Mr. McQueen's project have a good possibility of having their submittal considered and worked out by the DCA just like they consider any other Comp Plan amendment. Director Keating asked if Mr. McQueen was to be charged Comp Plan amendment fees the same as the others who submitted in July, but the Board indicated that he wouldn't be charged since Commis- sioner Scurlock had suggested that the County initiate the nodal concept amendment back at the February 13th meeting. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously directed staff to initiate a Comp Plan amendment for the nodal concept for the 1-95 interchanges of SR -60 and CR -512 and work with Mr. McQueen and Mr. Barkett during the 60 -day period before the public hearing .for transmittal to the DCA along with the County's amendments. Peter Robinson, local builder, understood.that any property lying outside the urban land use area and the urban service district could not be serviced, and Director Keating explained that it is a 1/4 of a mile outside the existing line within the 2010 urban service area. Commissioner Scurlock asked if you can extend outside the urban service area with utilities, and Director Keating confirmed that you cannot extend service outside. SEP 2 6 1990 21 L_