My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/26/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
9/26/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:46 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:48:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/26/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E P 2 BOOK 81 F,q,E J5 7 <br />more of public hearings and the Commission has been pretty <br />steadfast on their position on zoning in that area. It just <br />doesn't seem right that someone can,walk into a public hearing at <br />the last minute and convince you that you should be looking at 1 <br />unit -per 2-1/2 acres that -you have zoned 1 unit per 40 acres. <br />Attorney Dill stressed that there are a lot of people who worked <br />very hard with petitions and letters to the Governor and Cabinet <br />to get that property ranked as high as it is on the CARL <br />listings, and they are not going to be very happy to hear that <br />all.of a sudden this land may be downzoned significantly to a <br />point where it substantially increases the property value. 'in <br />the interests of fairness, he felt the Coraci request should be <br />required to go through all the public hearings the same as every <br />body elses property. <br />Chairman Eggert assured him that it will go through all the <br />public hearings. The only direction that is being given to staff <br />tonight is to work with them and come back with a recommendation. <br />She also pointed out that two weeks ago, the DCA wasn't giving <br />anything on this, and to hear that Secretary Pelham is talking <br />about perhaps putting it at 1 unit per 2-1/2 acres is a big <br />change from what we were being told. <br />Attorney Collins explained that this change is not effective <br />as of tonight; it is simply saying that we will transmit to the <br />State this intervener's proposal. It is really a settlement <br />proposal on their behalf, and if they can convince the DCA that <br />it is reasonable and can convince the County that it is <br />reasonable, we will get the DCA's comments back and we will have <br />a final adoption hearing. However, that is a 6 month's process <br />minimum. Nothing is being approved tonight -- we are only saying <br />that we will both try to resolve this as a settlement. <br />There being no others who wished to be heard in this matter, <br />Chairman Eggert closed the Public Hearing. <br />28 <br />- M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.