Laserfiche WebLink
QCT 21-990 <br />BOOK 81 FACE 6ti 7 <br />Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that we have said that new <br />growth must pay for itself and the consultants are looking at <br />that. He anticipated a big increase in wastewater impact fees <br />since that cost is related to the cost of getting rid of <br />effluent. He stressed that there is absolutely no cheaper time <br />to do it than right now. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the timeframes for building the <br />regional wastewater plants, and Director Pinto emphasized that we <br />are ready to build them right now if we had the money. We do <br />have some time in the south county, but the west county is a time <br />bomb because of the moratorium factor included -in the concurrency <br />requirements established for March, 1991. <br />Chairman Eggert felt the Board members might take this <br />report and absorb it and then come back, but Commissioner <br />Scurlock suggested holding specific workshops. <br />Chairman Eggert preferred that the workshops be held as the <br />various concurrency requirements come up. She felt this <br />presentation has been extremely helpful and thanked staff for <br />putting it together. <br />REQUEST FROM ST. LUCIE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL FOR <br />SUPPORT OF PORT DEEPENING PROJECT <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/25/90: <br />St. Lucie County Economic <br />Development Council <br />Advancing Business Opportunities <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mr. Bruce Redus, Director of Economic Development, <br />Indian River County Committee of 100, and <br />Mr. Jim Mcruffey, Executive Director Economic Council <br />of Martin County <br />FROM: Al Rivett, Director of Economic Development <br />DATE: September 25, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Port of Ft. Pierce <br />As you may be aware, Ft. Pierce and St. Lucie County have been working on the deepening of the <br />Port of Ft. Pierce for several years. Because St. Lucie County has received difficulty gaining <br />61 <br />