My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
10/23/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 9:51:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a OT 2 3.1990 MOK <br />October: 12, 1990 <br />Hoard ;.off}Coiinty-c ommissioners <br />iiidian .Fi e�ri CoUi�ty Administration Building <br />*ito <br />ib'40 25th <br />}"NErEl.6.. ida 32960 <br />Re • c�P?YI{g; arifl Drainage Improvements to 44th <br />veriu�'from 16th Street to Pinewood Sub- <br />division <br />Dear Commissioners: <br />I am a part of the Vero Beach Alliance Church <br />and want to voice my opposition to the paving <br />of 44th Avenue because of the extreme financial <br />hardship this will cause on my church. Our <br />share of the cost is $12,233 for 690' which <br />is to be paid in two years with 12% interest. <br />81 PAPIE 756 <br />This will cause a severe financial burden on an <br />already big mortgage payment that is taking every <br />penny of church contributions. This would prevent <br />us from being able to pay our weekly bills. <br />Some of the residents on 44th Avenue that <br />originally signed the petition for paving, <br />are now content with the road remaining unpaved <br />because it has been blocked off to thru traffic. <br />In addition, they sympathize with our church's <br />financial situation. <br />There -are so many other heavily travelled roads <br />that need to be paved, that it seems unnecessary <br />to pave 44th Avenue. <br />This topic is scheduled for October 23rd and <br />your understanding of our critical situation <br />would be greatly appreciated. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />Mrs. Gentile advised that we also have received a petition <br />from 10 people opposing the project, which petition is on file in <br />the Office of Clerk to the Board. When the project was <br />originally proposed, we had a petition with 73% favoring it, and <br />the improvement was approved on September 25th by the Board <br />of County Commissioners. <br />Chairman Eggert believed that the letters received in opposi- <br />tion to the project were all from members of the church located <br />in this neighborhood. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard. <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.