Laserfiche WebLink
Another consideration involves impact fees. While the state <br />concurrency rule does not reference impact fees, that is an <br />important action in the county table-. Because impact fees provide <br />the revenue to replace the capacity being reserved for a project, <br />payment of those fees allows for the necessary facility expansions <br />required to make concurrency work. While no new impact fees are <br />being proposed and no impact fee increases are being implemented <br />with the concurrency system, the timing of fee payments is changing <br />in some cases. With concurrency, impact fees must be paid when <br />capacity is reserved; the major implication of this change is that <br />fees must be paid when subdivision applications are submitted, <br />instead of at the building permit issuance stage as it was <br />previously. <br />As presented, the table reflects the staff's position on <br />implementing the concurrency requirement. It is the staff's <br />position that the actions required of applicants will allow <br />development to occur and ensure that the necessary facilities to <br />maintain the county's quality of life will be provided. The staff <br />will provide additional explanation of the table and concurrency <br />system implementation.at the October 23, 1990 meeting. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the board of county commissioners review this <br />information and the concurrency requirements table. <br />CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS TABLE FOLLOWS: <br />OCT 2 3 1990 51 mor 81 P,�G�. 10 <br />