My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
12/5/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:01:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br />M <br />Davis and all the County engineers and planners gave unlimited <br />time to keeping people informed on the impacts of the project. <br />He believed there had been 3 public hearings going as far back as <br />1986. There wasn't any problem then, but now all of a sudden <br />there is, and he cannot help but feel that those who have spoken <br />against the project tonight have a personal interest. <br />Chairman Eggert noted that the following letter was received <br />from Lambert Real Estate, Inc.: <br />•� c3� DISTRIBUTION LIST <br />e.Z,L c` <br />i I <br />Commasioners <br />N e� 9911 rn Administrator L <br />L ' R L ESTATE, IN�torney i <br />IN 1G1,AUTIF� SEBASTIAN RIVER AREA Personnel <br />` , `�'�'"W he Tropics Begin" Public Works <br />1��9151b1��2 � 9 Community uev. <br />Utilities <br />Finance ---=-� <br />,r ! E.C� : C! Box 780187 <br />Other STIAN, FLORIDA 32978-0187 <br />(305)589.8700 <br />November 30,199b <br />County Commissioners <br />Sebastian City Council <br />Re: Parcel # 07-31-39-00000-3000-00007.0 <br />As the owners of one of the few impacted properties on CR 512, we <br />take this opportunity to express our opinion of the on-going <br />hassle over the twin pair portion of CR 512. <br />Our property has 300' fronting existing CR 512 with 176' fronting <br />on the County owned Railroad R/W. <br />Our first preference would be to put all four lanes on the <br />Railroad R/W, leaving that portion of existing CR 512 from Old <br />Dixie to just West of the elementary school as a service road to <br />serve the commercial businesses along that span. This would have <br />several desirable results: <br />(1)' The need for the 74' setback currently required on that <br />portion of commercial CR 512 would be eliminated. This should <br />please those owners, who could than utilize their entire <br />property. <br />(2) The proposed new FEC Railroad crossing would be at grade. <br />Closing the existing crossing at US 1 and CR 512 would eliminate <br />the hill and the difficult, if not dangerous, crossing. <br />(3) The entire ROW, from CR,510 to U.S.#1 is already owned by the <br />County. <br />13 BOOK 1 <br />DEC b'990 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.