Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />BOOK� PAGEc� <br />DEC I I A90 <br />Director Keating asked if the intent of increasing the <br />setback is for aesthetic reasons and view from the river or <br />stormwater purposes and impact on the wetlands environment. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stated that he is looking at more than <br />stormwater retention. He is looking for a combination of not <br />only the aesthetics, but also the impact of encroachment. <br />Discussion continued regarding the Motion, and Chairman <br />Eggert summarized that the Motion would include approval of staff <br />recommendation, a maximum of 120 acres disturbed, required clus- <br />tering, and a note regarding reevaluation of the 100' setback. <br />COMMISSIONER BOWMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried 4 to 1 with <br />Commissioner Bird voting in opposition. <br />The Board recessed at 1:30 o'clock P.M. for lunch and <br />reconvened at 2:30 -P.M. with all members present. Deputy Clerk <br />Barbara Bonnah took over from Deputy Clerk Virginia Hargreaves <br />for the remainder of the meeting. <br />96 <br />