My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/11/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
12/11/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:47 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:02:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/11/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In discussing this matter with the county attorney's office, I was <br />informed by Charles Vitunac that formal action by the board of. <br />county commissioners would be necessary to authorize <br />reconsideration of the rezoning. Either you or another <br />commissioner would have to request such board authorization. If so <br />authorized, then a public hearing could be advertised and held. <br />Until action is taken by the board, the staff cannot proceed with <br />this matter.•• If you decide to pursue reconsideration of the <br />board's denial of -this rezoning, please contact me. <br />TO: Commissioner Carolyn Eggert, Chairman <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Sasan Rohani 5-112 . <br />Chief, Long -Range Planning <br />DATE: December 10, 1990 <br />RE: Jarvis Rezoning Request (ZC-292) <br />On August 14, 1990 the Board of County Commissioners voted 3 to 2 <br />to deny the Jarvis rezoning request to rezone 1.95 acres at 8th <br />Street and 6th Avenue from RM -10, Multiple -Family Residential <br />District to CG, General Commercial District. . <br />In order to reconsider this rezoning, a formal action by the Board <br />of County Commissioners would be necessary. Upon the Board's <br />authorization, a public hearing could then be advertised and held. <br />The applicant has agreed to the following change to the original <br />application: <br />To put a conservation easement on the easterly 150 feet of the <br />property, from 6th Avenue a distance of 150 feet to the west, <br />before any consideration for the remainder of the property to be <br />rezoned to CG district. With a conservation easement, there will <br />be limits on what the applicant can do with this portion of the <br />property. This portion of the property could be used for <br />landscaping and a drainage retention/detention pond. <br />To meet the rezoning concurrency requirement, the applicant shall <br />provide the following additional documents: <br />* A new survey for the portion of the property requested to <br />be rezoned to CG .district; and <br />* A developer's agreement with the Utilities Department for <br />satisfying the concurrency requirement. <br />Although the county cannot approve a conditional rezoning, the <br />applicant has indicated that he understands that when he applies <br />for a site plan or any other development order, there will be no <br />access to 6th Avenue. <br />cc: Robert M. Keating, AICP <br />Community Development Director <br />141 <br />" <br />BOOK ,'' „� <br />A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.