Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />the AG areas west of Blue Cypress, the DCA would say that we <br />breached the agreement. <br />Debate continued as to exactly what we are doing today and <br />how it all relates. Commissioner Bird noted that, in other <br />words, the discussion on the next agenda item is do we still <br />support the compromise plan that was agreed to between us and the <br />DCA, and if we disagree with part of that or someone from the <br />public disagrees, now is the time to speak. <br />This was confirmed. <br />AMEND COMP PLAN TO ADOPT REMEDIAL ACTIONS REQUIRED BY COMPLIANCE <br />AGREEMENT <br />Director Keating gave a brief review of the following memo: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Robert M. Keating, AI <br />Community Develo ennnt rector <br />FROM: Sasan Rohani S• • �c . <br />Chief, Long -Range Planning <br />DATE: December 5, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ADOPT THE <br />REMEDIAL ACTIONS REQUIRED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY/DCA <br />COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal <br />consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular <br />meeting of December 11, 1990. <br />C Promotion of Urban Sprawl: <br />The DCA contended that the county's plan fails to discourage <br />the proliferation of urban sprawl because the densities and <br />intensities of uses assigned in the FLUM to rural and <br />EC 111990 41 soar �'A <br />UC. <br />