Laserfiche WebLink
DEC I11990 BOOK 8' P','E S <br />ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented. The analysis will include a <br />description of current and future land uses in the agricultural <br />areas and potential impacts on the other plan elements. <br />Current and Future Land Uses in the Agricultural Areas <br />At present, there is no mechanism in the adopted comprehensive plan <br />to control the development of agricultural lands. Agricultural <br />land may be developed in a large lot pattern which could lead to <br />ranchette type development. This ranchette type development could <br />potentially absorb a large portion of agricultural land area for <br />non-agricultural uses. Provisions identified in the proposed <br />remedial actions amendment to the plan, however, will resolve this <br />problem by requiring non-agricultural uses within areas having an <br />agricultural land use designation to be clustered. <br />As identified in Policy 1.7 of the Future Land Use Element, the <br />main purposes of. the agricultural use category are to ensure. <br />continuation of the agricultural industry, to protect agricultural <br />lands from urban encroachment, and to provide natural open space. <br />The clustered non-agricultural requirement which has been <br />incorporated in the proposed remedial actions will ensure that the <br />intent of Policy 1.7 of the Future Land Use Element will be met. <br />However, the proposed remedial actions do not provide for <br />development of multi -use projects in the agricultural areas. Such <br />multi -use projects functioning as self-sufficient communities could <br />be established without creating urban sprawl through the mechanism <br />of a mixed use designation. <br />Through traditional land use and zoning regulations, residential <br />and other non-agricultural development are limited in <br />agriculturally designated lands. With a mixed use floating <br />designation, increased residential densities and other non- <br />agricultural uses could be allowed in the agricultural areas under <br />strictly controlled conditions. The ability to provide for higher <br />residential densities and associated non-agricultural uses makes a <br />mixed use designation an important tool for development within <br />agricultural areas. The stringent requirements of the mixed use <br />designation will ensure the creation of self-sufficient communities <br />which can absorb increases in density and intensity and ensure high <br />internal trip capture to reduce travel demands on county roads <br />without adversely affecting the surrounding areas. <br />Through buffer requirements, these mixed use projects will be <br />buffered from neighboring land uses, eliminating potential land use <br />conflicts. Compatibility of uses internally and externally will be <br />addressed through the requirement that projects within the mixed <br />use designation comply with established Planned Development (P.D.) <br />standards. Such mixed use projects will provide even more county <br />control over development in the agricultural areas. <br />In*analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of a mixed use land <br />use designation, the county must consider its adopted plan, its <br />revised plan if the remedial actions are approved by the Board of <br />County Commissioners, and its revised plan if the mixed-use <br />designation is approved in addition to the remedial actions. The <br />following chart summarizes the land use advantages and <br />disadvantages for each of the above scenarios: <br />64 <br />M M <br />