Laserfiche WebLink
echoed Commissioner Wheeler's assertion that DCA provides a good system of checks and <br />balances. <br />Chairman Solari presented arguments opposing the Resolution, which included his <br />disagreement with DCA's directive to include, at this time, an Energy Conservation Map in the <br />County's Future Land Use Element, and his desire to limit bureaucracy. He pointed out, <br />however, that his stance was not indicative of a wish to see DCA dismantled. <br />Commissioners Davis and Flescher, who both opposed the Resolution, asserted that <br />decisions affecting a local region should be made at the regional, rather than State, level. <br />Brian Carman, Indian River Neighborhood Association, explained his view that DCA <br />was indispensable to prevent urban/suburban sprawl. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 2-3 <br />vote (Commissioners Flescher, Solari, Davis opposed), the <br />Motion FAILED. The Board DENIED the request to <br />direct the County Attorney to draft a Resolution of <br />Support for the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). <br />14. C. COMMISSIONER WESLEY S. DAVIS-NONE <br />14.D. COMMISSIONER JOSEPH E. FLESCHER-NONE <br />14.E. COMMISSIONER PETER D. O'BRYAN- NONE <br />15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS <br />December 14, 2010 18 <br />