My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/5/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
2/5/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:08 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:06:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/05/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J� � '69 U M � •U <br />,poor Ft1;F 610 <br />Also attached as Exhibit II is a proposed franchise modification <br />for the two currently franchised solid waste transporters. This <br />franchise is for review, and to provide a breakdown of the pro— <br />posed collection and recycling services, along with the -antici— <br />pated costs thereof. <br />The franchise is an exhibit only at this time and it will be fi— <br />nalized and presented for adoption shortly after the Board <br />considers and adopts the proposed ordinance. Please review the <br />franchise for information on the procedures and anticipated costs <br />associated with the proposed collection and recycling program. <br />Commissioner Scurlock stated that although he has been <br />somewhat of a supporter for mandatory collection, he has changed <br />his mind to some extent after looking at more current numbers <br />than the 13.49% from our present recycling effort. In looking at <br />some later data with Administrator Chandler yesterday, it looks <br />like that number may be as high as 18%. With that increase and <br />with a number of our programs not being fully implemented as yet, <br />plus the fact that there may be some more aggressive programs <br />that could be developed, he felt it would be premature to direct <br />staff to develop an ordinance for mandatory collection at this <br />time. He would prefer to see us go into what he calls Phase II <br />of our program, which would encompass watching the programs that <br />we have established already to become fully implemented; going to <br />districting where the two franchised haulers -don't pick up in the <br />same area; expanding our commercial effort for recycling as well <br />as upgrading some of the service centers to encourage more <br />recycling; and having more drop-off containers similar to the <br />ones they have in Ft. Pierce. Commissioner Scurlock felt that in <br />Phase II we will have an opportunity to sit back and see what the <br />additional increases are in our recycling efforts. He believed <br />there is a real potential within that to get to 220-24%. The 300 <br />that we hear is a guideline. When he called Tallahassee to try <br />to identify where we were at, the State commended us and our <br />effort on our reporting. In fact, they told him that Indian <br />River County has one of the best efforts put forth in the state. <br />He felt we could be proud of that and our staff for trying to put <br />a project together. However, the State is mandating a couple of <br />things by 1991, such as the separation of grass material, <br />clippings, etc. He was told that the actual 30% is a goal and <br />not an absolute firm number and one that will be revisited. <br />Therefore, he honestly feels that the best direction we could <br />give at this time is to authorize staff to move forward in an <br />aggressive manner to do the things that he has just said and to <br />delay what he calls Phase III, mandatory collection, to a later <br />date. In fact, if we can meet our goals in a voluntary fashion, <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.