2/12/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chairman Bird called the Special Meeting to order and announced that it was for the purpose of reviewing the proposed minor amendments to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs). Planning Director Boling made the staff presentation, as follows: TO: The Honorable Members of The Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: 4 Robert M. Keating, AICP Community Development DC/rector Ad FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: February 5, 1991 SUBJECT: Minor Amendments to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs): Barkett Petition and Staff Initiated Changes It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 12, 1991. BACKGROUND AND CONDITIONS: In December 1990, Attorney Bruce Barkett on behalf of National Retirement Company filed an application to amend a subsection of the LDRs. This was the first petition, and the only one filed thus far, to amend the new LDRs. Since the LDRs were adopted in September 1990, staff has kept a file on each LDR chapter and has kept a record of all necessary "clean-up" changes as problems or errors have been discovered. To minimize public hearings and to expedite a first-time minor revision "clean-up" of the LDRs, staff has worked with Mr. Barkett to allow consideration of staff - initiated minor LDR changes along with the petitioner's request. Thus staff has "piggy -backed" many minor "clean-up" changes along with consideration of the Barkett petition. Mr. Barkett Is proposed changes, along with staff's proposed changes except the Section 32 item of the proposed ordinance (see attachment #2), have been discussed and considered by the Professional Services Advisory Committee. At its regular meeting of January 10, 1991, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend that the County approve the proposed changes. The Planning and Zoning Commission at its meeting of January 24, 1991 also considered the proposed LDR amendments and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendments. It should be noted that the staff -initiated and Barkett petition amendments were advertised separately so that, at its discretion, the Board could consider and/or adopt these requests separately. Staff is presenting both the staff -initiated and Barkett petition requests together and under one proposed ordinance at this time. FEB 1'2 1