My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/12/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
3/12/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:08 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:11:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/12/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />NAR 12 1991 <br />nor <br />r.d P,�'E JUEJ <br />property owner," but his ability to pass it through is strictly out <br />of our control. <br />Mr. Pitiak wished it to be stated FOR THE RECORD that this <br />agreement is saying that a mobile home owner who does not own his <br />property is not subject to the fee. <br />Attorney Vitunac agreed he is not subject to the fee by this <br />ordinance, but we do not know what is said in his lease with the <br />park owner. <br />Mr. Pitiak continued that prior to 1985 the agreements do not <br />contain that language; yet, because of this ordinance, the park <br />owners are passing through the impact fee to the tenants. He would <br />like the Commissioners to study this. There is no need for haste <br />in adopting this ordinance. <br />Mr. Pitiak wished to have a statement made for the record as <br />to just who owes this fee, and Commissioner Scurlock stated FOR THE <br />RECORD that there is nothing in this ordinance that requires anyone <br />other than the real property owner to pay the impact fees. <br />Mr. Pitiak felt, in regard to rate increases, the figures just <br />don't jibe. He wished he could agree with the consultant who said <br />it would only cost $1.00 per month more in water and a couple for <br />sewer. He calculated that his water and sewer bill, if this <br />ordinance is adopted, will go up nearly 50% to 60%; on 7,000 gallon <br />consumption, water and sewer will come out to over $105 per month. <br />He also felt the impact fees are too high. What is shown will be <br />over 100% increase, and construction costs, et cetera, have not <br />increased that much. Mr. Pitiak suggested the Board take a hard <br />look at these rates because he felt a lot of people eventually will <br />not be able to afford these rates, especially those people in <br />mobile home parks. If they are forced to go ahead and pay these <br />impact fees,they will just walk away from their homes and leave <br />them for the County to clean them up. Mr. Pitiak asked the Board <br />to review his comments and not adopt the rate schedule or this <br />ordinance until all these questions are answered. <br />Michael Radell of Steel, Hector and Davis, City of Miami, <br />representing American Retirement Communities, owner of Heritage <br />Village Mobile Home Park located at 1101 Ranch Road, expressed <br />concerns, not as to the size of the impact fee, but rather to the <br />fairness and equity in how that impact fee is distributed among <br />different users, in particular mobile home park users. He said he <br />had three basic issues to present for the Board's consideration. <br />One is that the ordinance as currently proposed does not make a <br />distinction between new mobile home parks and existing mobile home <br />parks and it charges one ERU for a mobile home regardless of <br />whether there is a long-term history of precisely what the impact <br />40 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.