Laserfiche WebLink
individuals through their conservation rate program; they wanted to <br />be treated on an ERU basis in that case. So, we don't see any <br />reason to treat them any differently when it comes to setting up <br />some separate class for assigning ERUs. <br />On the point of using different figures for reporting <br />wastewater capacity to DER, that is because DER has chosen that <br />standard and that doesn't mean we must use the same standard. <br />As to the third point, relating to use of impact fee refunds <br />for residential customers, as ownership of residences change, flows <br />change, and the same case can be made by virtually any customer on <br />the system. <br />Director Pinto commented one of the problems all utilities <br />have is, really, the definition of community; we consider Indian <br />River County as one community. When we try to derive specific <br />rates to reflect specific areas, there are some parts of the County <br />which would increase substantially and there are areas that would <br />decrease substantially. Within the present rate structure he was <br />very sure that 50% of the people are using more and 50% using less <br />and we have to look at the demographics of the entire County to <br />come up with a mean. Director Pinto also pointed out that <br />treating existing units differently than new units was judged <br />discriminatory by the New Jersey Supreme Court. <br />Mr. Radell wanted to respond regarding the figures reported to <br />DER, that there is no requirement to commit the rate that is <br />published by DER. He further commented that there are other fairer <br />ways of setting rates and a single rate schedule is <br />administratively convenient. <br />Bob Strang, from Shady Rest Mobile Home Park in Sebastian, <br />came before the Board and said he had a piece of paper which the <br />owner of the park gave to him on February 19 at a meeting at which <br />time the owner told the tenants how much they have to pay. His <br />question concerned whether the park owner should send the tax money <br />to California. <br />Attorney Vitunac advised him that it is not tax money, it is <br />a rent payment from the tenant to the property owner. He also said <br />that if it is not proper charge the tenants should not pay it, <br />and should get proper legal counsel and fight it. However, the <br />owner contracted with the County to connect when the sewer lines <br />were put in. Now the lines are in and the park must connect and no <br />matter how much the County is concerned, the County cannot legally <br />become involved in agreements between the owner and the tenants. <br />Mr. Strang questioned Mr. Pinto as to a pump and lift station <br />costing $35,000; if the tenants pay for it, who owns it. <br />43 <br />MAR 12 1991 <br />J <br />