My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/19/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
3/19/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:08 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:12:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/19/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
treatment plant that had been totally obligated as far as <br />capacity, and the total cost of that plant was being funded by <br />those who were paying impact fees. What the agreement meant to <br />the Utility Department and the County was that the minute we <br />entered into the agreement, we had to obligate for the total <br />capacity required for that entire mobile home park. Addressing <br />that during the negotiations, the agreement was struck that <br />$143,000 would be turned over to the County in lieu of the <br />responsibility of paying base facility charges up until the time <br />of connection to the County system. Of course, all the fees <br />would be required to be paid on a monthly basis at the time they <br />did connect. Since the $143,000 was not money that came from any <br />specific mobile home owner or from the new owner of the mobile <br />home park, everyone, including the residents, felt it the very <br />best thing to turn that money over to the County because someone <br />else would be paying the base facility charges which may be <br />required to be paid in the future. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked what amounts we are talking about <br />for base facility charges from the time of that ordinance until <br />now, and Attorney Vitunac advised that a rough calculation shows <br />it would be around $300,000, but certainly more than $143,000. <br />Director Pinto confirmed that it was an extensive amount. <br />Another aspect was that when a resident sold their unit and paid <br />their impact fee, that impact fee was locked in and could never <br />increase again even though they were not connected to the system <br />yet. We had to be very careful not to run into the same problem <br />that they ran into with the original agreement regarding those <br />impact fees. The agreement contained a carefully structured <br />arrangement, and staff felt it was a good agreement and the <br />County Attorney and County Commission agreed. <br />Continuing, Director Pinto explained that after the west <br />county wastewater treatment plant was completed, the County put <br />the present park owner on notice to connect. He is currently in <br />violation of that notice, and if he doesn't connect in a short <br />amount of time, that specific issue will have to come before the <br />Board in a public hearing where the Board will have to take some <br />formal action on whether or not to go to litigation. However, <br />the park owner has hired engineers, who are doing the design of <br />the internal connection system. <br />Director Pinto emphasized that the County has always tried <br />to avoid litigation in these matters because of the cost that <br />would be borne by the users of the system, and Commissioner <br />Scurlock added that another reason has been because of the fear <br />34 BOOK. ®F' Gt <br />MAR 19 1991 <br />_ J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.