4/2/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NPRI 2 1991 BnK 83 F -AGE 3f Commissioner Eggert felt that would create the opportunity to get the signal. Considerable discussion ensued re the improvements in Item 2 and whose responsibility they are, and Director Davis confirmed that the eastbound right turn lane on 99th is not on the DOT system and would be a county road. Commissioner Bowman inquired about the cost involved with Item 1, and Director Davis estimated roughly about $50/60,000. Dr. Fischer stated that he did not have any problem with doing the eastbound turn lane on 99th and getting an impact fee credit. Chairman Bird asked if he would participate in the signal- ization and get a credit for that, too, but Dr. Fischer had a problem with that as he believed the signal is warranted even if he doesn't build his project. Debate followed as to who would participate in the signal- ization, the benefited area, our capital improvements program, etc., with Dr. Fischer continuing to contend that the signal is required whether or not he builds. Commissioner Scurlock wished to offer a Motion and noted that he would not include doing the signal. Commissioner Bowman brought up the credit for limerock, but Commissioner Scurlock felt that staff should work that out with Dr. Fischer. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously agreed to the following: Item 1 - Try to enter into an agreement with the DOT to get turning lanes built on U.S.I.; Dr. Fischer to go ahead with the eastbound right turn lane on 99th St. and get impact fee credit; no signal now, but keep pressure on the DOT for this. Item 2 - Dr. Fischer to widen 99th St. to 241. Item 3 - Not Fischer's responsibility. Item 4 - Not Fischer's responsibility. Item 5 - signage Fischer's responsibility. 32