My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/16/1991
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1991
>
4/16/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:08 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:14:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/16/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAID DOCUMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF <br />CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />Administrator Chandler commented that all of Block 44 that we <br />need will have now been acquired. He noted that this is the only <br />property where we have had to pay severance damages, but we are <br />still well below budget. <br />J COUNTRYSIDE STUDY <br />Administrator Chandler reported that in following the <br />Commission's instructions to study documents from 185 forwarc�he, <br />of necessity, began reviewing various items in documents prior to <br />1985, to the extent he is so deeply into the period between 1980 <br />and 1985, he felt it would be valuable to review that period from <br />1980 to date and present recommendations to the Board. The reason <br />for bringing it up today is because the Commission specified just <br />185 forward. His aim at this point in time is to have a meeting <br />next week with the representative of Countryside and be in the <br />position to bring it to the Commission the week after or the <br />following week. <br />Commissioner Scurlock concurred with Mr. Chandler and <br />explained that his motion actually was in two parts with the main <br />thrust of the motion being that the 1985 agreement is, in fact, the <br />critical and valid agreement wherein all outstanding prior issues <br />were resolved, but in order to analyze the terms of that agreement <br />a review of prior records was necessary. So, if he is only looking <br />for authorization to do further research, that's fine. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously <br />authorized Administrator Chandler to review prior <br />records. <br />Discussion continued regarding time and volume of information <br />involved in the research. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked the Administrator to confirm that <br />any information requested by any member of the public has been made <br />available and that Mr. Chandler has never gotten pressure from Mr. <br />Scurlock or any member of the Board, or the Board of Commissioners, <br />to withhold any information from the public. <br />Administrator Chandler said there has never been that kind of <br />pressure. He further stated that the only pressure on him is the <br />time it is taking to review and analyze the documents. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wanted to establish that fact because of <br />41 <br />BOOK �:,� P;UE l� <br />APR 1 I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.