Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 11991 BOOK 83 <br />open space requirement for Commercial/Industrial as set out in <br />Section 10 on page 8 of the ordinance. She wished to hear a <br />little more discussion on the rationale regarding the increase <br />from 20o to 250 on the PD ordinance. <br />Director Boling explained that the rationale for changing <br />the PD Section is that right now the 20% is not consistent with <br />the 25% we require from a normal site plan in a commercial area. <br />The rationale is to make it consistent with the other processes <br />we have in place. When the LDRs were adopted last fall, the open <br />space requirements for commercial areas were increased from 200 <br />to 25%. <br />Mrs. Offutt wished to respectfully suggest that to make <br />Planned Developments conform to free-standing commercial sites <br />kind of takes away the whole reason for applying for a PD, which <br />is to get more consideration than a free-standing commercial <br />site. <br />Commissioner Eggert guessed she thinks of a PD having more <br />open p space, not less. <br />There being no others who wished to be heard, Vice Chairman <br />Wheeler closed the Public Hearing. <br />Attorney Vitunac announced that the proposed ordinance will <br />be considered again at the second Public Hearing on May 15, 1991, <br />at 5:01 o'clock P.M. <br />There being no further business, on Motion duly made, <br />seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 5:40 o'clock P.M. <br />ATTEST: <br />Clerk <br />12 <br />Chairman <br />