Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 7 1991 <br />I <br />BOOK <br />Commissioner Bowman and County Attorney Vitunac pointed out <br />typographical errors in Attachment A to the ordinance and Attorney <br />Vitunac suggested changes in wording on Section 200.04: where it <br />now says "assessments shall be equal and uniform," it will be <br />changed to "the assessments shall be fairly apportioned." Mr. <br />Vitunac further commented that Assistant County Attorney O'Brien is <br />currently rewriting our entire County Code and one of his charges <br />was to try to bring together all the street lighting MSBUs and TUs <br />into one format so they can be found easily in the Code and be <br />standard from now on. It also gives you the power to specially <br />assess or take a one -lump -sum cash payment by people who miss the <br />deadline each year. As you know the State requires that these <br />things be created by a certain deadline. It can lead to over a <br />year's wait for people. If they really want the service this <br />ordinance allows them to pay for it up front, so it's a good <br />change. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the <br />public hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, 'SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted <br />Ordinance 91-20 providing for Uniform Procedures and <br />Treatment of Municipal Service Benefit Units <br />providing Street Lighting, with corrections as <br />indicated by the County Attorney. <br />54 <br />