Laserfiche WebLink
THE SCOPE OF THE ENGINEERING REPORT SHALL BE DEPENDENT ON THE <br /> COMPLEXITY OT THE PROPOSED PROJECT FOLLOWING CUSTOMARY <br /> ENGINEERING STANDARDS. GUIDELINES WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT THE <br /> INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICE <br /> (INITIAL) <br /> D. METHOD (S) OF FLOW DERIVATION (CHECK APPROPRIATE LINES <br /> ( ) EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL UNIT DETERMINATION TABLE <br /> ( ) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE <br /> ( ) EXISTING FACILITY/PREVIOUS RECORDS <br /> 1. ERU DETERMINATION TABLE (COPY ATTACHED): <br /> TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT <br /> SQUARE FEET <br /> APPLICABLE UNITS <br /> WATER: <br /> PROJECTED FLOW (ERUS)x 250 GALLONS/DAY= GPD(ADF) <br /> WASTEWATER: <br /> PROJECTED FLOW (ERUS)x 250 GALLONS/ DAY= GPD (ADF) <br /> 2. SPECIFIC INDUSTRIAL USE: <br /> TYPE (S) OF USE <br /> WATER: <br /> PROJECT FLOW <br /> WASTEWATER: <br /> PROJECT FLOW <br /> 3. EXISTING FACILITY/PREVIOUS RECORDS: <br /> THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT MAY CONSIDER THE PAST <br /> RECORDS OF AN EXISTING OPERATIONAL FACILITY FOR DETERMINING PROPOSED <br /> FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR A NEW DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDED THE APPLICANT <br /> SUBMITS SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO ALLOW THE DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE <br /> ANTICIPATED FLOW. THIS INFORMATION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, <br /> TWENTY-FOUR MONTHS OF PREVIOUS WATER BILLS AND A COMPLETE LISTING OF <br /> THE DIFFERENCES IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACILITY SUCH AS SIZE, HOURS <br /> OF OPERATION, TYPE OF USES, NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, ETC. <br /> E. GENERAL: <br /> ADDITIONAL WATER FLOW ANTICIPATED FOR PROJECT PHASING, BUT NOT <br /> REQUESTED <br /> (ESTIMATED) <br /> PAGE 2 <br /> I a 3. -r. 3. <br />