My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/08/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
01/08/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:47:48 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:54:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/08/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
163
Subject
Greenway
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004BE.tif
SmeadsoftID
14193
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of County Commissioners <br /> December 31, 2012 <br /> ~- Page Four <br /> business must be replaced with payment of the fees by the County from another source. The proposed <br /> new incentive would be for the County to pay some or all of the impact fees for new or expanding busi- <br /> nesses in the Enterprise Zone. Funding for this payment would likely come from general revenues, gas <br /> tax revenues (for transportation impact fees) or the one cent sales tax revenues. The consensus of the <br /> Agency was to not recommend approval of this proposed incentive. <br /> 2. Financing o, f Impact Fees on More Favorable Terms. As noted above, the County already has a <br /> financing program for impact fees. With respect to water/sewer impact fees, the term is generally five <br /> years, with a hardship exception to ten years, and the interest rate is 5.75%per annum. The County does <br /> not typically finance other types of impact fees, although this has been done on a case by case basis for <br /> certain large employers. The proposed new incentive would be to either increase the term or lower the <br /> interest rate, or both. The challenge would be to secure payment with a lien which would survive fore- <br /> closure of a pre-existing mortgage. The Agency did not appear to reach a consensus on a recommenda- <br /> tion for approval or non-approval of this proposed incentive. It should be noted that, unrelated to Coun- <br /> ty incentives, impact fees can typically be financed with the construction lender, as part of the overall <br /> construction cost of a project. <br /> 3. Waive or Subsidize (in whole or in part) Development Fees. Any business seeking to locate or <br /> �— expand in the Enterprise Zone will likely incur development fees (such as a site plan application fee <br /> which typically ranges from $1,000 to $1,400, and a concurrency application fee of$120) and a building <br /> permit fee ($4.15 per $1,000 of construction cost). The proposal is to waive development fees, which <br /> would not require payment from another source because the planning department is funded through gen- <br /> eral revenues; and to subsidize the building_permit fee, which would require payment by the County <br /> from another source because the building department is organized as an enterprise fund, funded through <br /> collected fees. The consensus of the Agency was to recommend approval of this proposed incentive. <br /> 4. Subsidize (in whole or in part) Water and Sewer Connection Charges. Typical water and sewer <br /> connection charges are currently $155 (meter install fee of$130 and service fee of$25). The proposed <br /> incentive is for the County to pay these charges on behalf of the new or expanding business in the En- <br /> terprise Zone. Because the Utilities Department is also organized as an enterprise fund, payment by the <br /> County from another source would be required. The consensus of the Agency was to recommend ap- <br /> proval of this proposed incentive. <br /> 5. Infrastructure Improvement Program. Infrastructure improvements (roads, turn lanes, utility <br /> lines, etc) may be required for a business to locate or expand in the Enterprise Zone. While the County <br /> already has general authority to provide such improvements to encourage economic development <br /> throughout the unincorporated County (as noted above), a specific program outlining the circumstances <br /> under which the County will consider providing such improvements in the Enterprise Zone does not cur- <br /> rently exist. The proposed incentive is to create a specific program for the Enterprise Zone. The program <br /> F:W11 rn,lLmd.�GE'NERALOCCWge dnA1en TE w pK,,Zw 1-6—2.d- <br /> 103 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.