My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/08/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
01/08/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:47:48 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:54:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
01/08/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
163
Subject
Greenway
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004BE.tif
SmeadsoftID
14193
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UNDER DISCUSSION <br /> Mr. Godfrey said he would not be in favor of subsidizing (in whole or in part) or <br /> waiving development fees and/or building permit fees. <br /> Attorney Polackwich explained subsidizing building permit fees, was what the <br /> committee was reviewing. He said site plan applications and concurrency application <br /> fees were paid to the Planning Department which was funded out of general revenues, <br /> so the committee would not have to worry about subsidizing those fees. <br /> Attorney Polackwich said the Building Department was an enterprise fund so it <br /> survived on fees collected. He explained if the Building Department did not collect <br /> permit fees and inspection fees from businesses within the Enterprise Zone, the County <br /> would have to transfer funds from general revenues to the Building Department. <br /> A conversation ensued regarding the difficulties business owners in the <br /> Enterprise Zone had gone through for the incentives they thought were easily attainable <br /> to receive because they were in the Enterprise Zone. Chairman Chandler brought up a <br /> case in point regarding Oculina Bank and the hardship they went through with the <br /> Department of Revenue when they applied for their incentives. <br /> The general consensus of the committee was in favor: <br /> 3. The general consensus of the committee was to waive (in whole or in part) <br /> �-- development fees (e.g., site plan application, concurrency application, etc) <br /> and/or building permit fees (because the Building Department is an enterprise <br /> fund, the County would have to come up with funds to pay whatever building <br /> permit fees the Enterprise Zone does not pay) <br /> The Committee reviewed item #4 of the possible New Local Incentives Report <br /> 4. Subsidize (in whole or in part) water and sewer connection fees (because the <br /> Utilities Department is an enterprise fund, and because our Code and bond <br /> covenants prohibit any "free service" the County would have to come up with <br /> funds to pay whatever connection fees the Enterprise Zone does not pay) <br /> Attorney Polackwich recommended the committee discuss waiving water and <br /> sewer connection fees for businesses within the Enterprise Zone. He said it was not a <br /> large amount of money. He said the County would transfer funds from the Accounting <br /> Department to the Utilities Department. <br /> The general consensus of the committee was in favor. <br /> The general consensus of the committee was to waive water and sewer <br /> connection fees for businesses within the Enterprise Zone. <br /> EZDA UN-APPROVED 7 November 08, 2012 <br /> CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 1v n Q <br /> Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.