Laserfiche WebLink
i. Model Grid Development <br /> The model grid will extend from approximately 1 mile south of Sebastian Inlet to the southern boundary <br /> of the County (R-119). Sebastian Inlet has been excluded from this modeling effort due to the effort <br /> that would be required to include inlet effects. The model would have to be expanded to include Indian <br /> River Lagoon and significantly impact model setup and run time. The south County line has been <br /> selected as the southern boundary of the model because no alternatives are expected to be evaluated <br /> in this area. The beach at the south end of County (Sector 8) is stable to accretional based on previous <br /> analyses, thus not requiring intervention. The updated shoreline and volumetric change analysis will <br /> determine the validity of this assumption before finalizing the model domain. <br /> Given the computational intensity required to model sediment transport within the entire model domain, <br /> nested grids will be created for three areas in which beach management strategies can be further <br /> investigated. Three individual SWAN grids will be nested within the countywide SWAN grid to evaluate <br /> wave transformation adjacent to coastal structures. Similarly, three DeIft3D-FLOW grids will be used <br /> with domain decomposition in order to provide high level of detail of flows and morphology evolution in <br /> the three project areas and maintain efficient simulation timescales. It is anticipated that these finer <br /> grids will be focused in Sectors 3, 5, and 7, where erosion is a chronic problem and fill and/or structural <br /> solutions may be required. Sector 3 has historically suffered higher erosion rates though a beach and <br /> dune restoration project was recently constructed and a repair to the project is in the permitting <br /> process. Sector 1A has also experienced higher volumetric losses and shoreline retreat. However, this <br /> erosional stress is recognized as being a function of the Sebastian Inlet and is being addressed by the <br /> Sebastian Inlet District. No detailed evaluation is proposed in this area. <br /> The bathymetric data sets will be utilized to depict the past and present bathymetry using the model <br /> grids. Similarly, hardbottom surreys will be incorporated within the nested DeIft3D-FLOW grids. <br /> Historic hardbottom will be imported through GIS maps provided by the County. <br /> The model will be populated with available data. Nearshore bathymetric and topographic data will rely <br /> upon the latest countywide survey. Offshore hardbottom will be modeled by including all available data <br /> from.previous County monitoring efforts to the 2013 hardbottom mapping effort in Sector 3. Offshore <br /> bathymetric data will be based on surveys conducted by NOAA or USGS. Wind, wave, and water level <br /> measurements will be based on data collected by FIT, USACE and NOAA. No field work (hydrographic <br /> surveying, wave and tide Gauge deployment) is proposed in support of the modeling effort. If it is <br /> determined that the available data is insufficient to develop an accurate model then collection of <br /> additional data will be discussed with the County. The current assessment is that the available data <br /> should be sufficient. <br /> ii. Water Level& Current Calibration <br /> The water level and current measurements collected will be utilized to calibrate the Delft3DFLOW <br /> model. Wave measurements and water levels previously collected will provide the offshore boundary <br /> conditions for each calibration run. Water levels will provide the basis for evaluating the results of each <br /> calibration run. Present bathymetries will be used as input, along with concurrent wind data from <br /> NOAA. DeIft3DFLOW and SWAN will be run simultaneously to resolve the influence of waves on the <br /> 33 <br />