My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/19/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
11/19/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 10:53:26 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:06:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
11/19/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
204
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NV.tif
SmeadsoftID
14236
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The survey of the Cost of Implementation that the Florida Department of Financial Services has undertaken is not <br /> complete as of the writing of this white paper, nor are the results available. However, there are key points to consider <br /> regarding the Cost of Implementation. <br /> IMPLEMENTATION: <br /> In our view, regardless of the approach taken to implement the provisions of Section 215.89, Florida Statutes, significant <br /> resources will be required to comply with the proposed UCOA reporting requirements. <br /> MODIFYING CURRENT ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS: <br /> The first point to be made is that modifying the current accounting system to mirror the proposed UCOA will be labor <br /> intensive on the part of the entity's staff. Current accounting systems are set up to meet the needs of the individual <br /> entity's management and constituency. The UCOA concept with a goal of transparency does not focus on the individual <br /> particular needs of their constituencies. Modifications to mirror the UCOA will put financial burdens on entities and their <br /> staffs who are already burdened by budget cuts and staff reductions. <br /> A second point, as indicated in the section "UNCLEAR, CONFLICTING, OR DUPLICATIVE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS," is <br /> that some entities will perform double work to create the report required by other statutes, which will necessitate <br /> reporting on two different formats and entering data twice on a monthly basis, hence doubling the staff time and costs. <br /> CREATING A CROSSWALK FROM CURRENT SYSTEMS TO UCOA: <br /> Creating a crosswalk from current accounting systems to the UCOA will be costly for several reasons. First and foremost <br /> will be software costs. Programming current systems will require the particular vendor to provide programming services <br /> to accounting systems that are proprietary in nature and can only be reprogrammed by the vendors themselves. In <br /> today's world, programming rates on an hourly basis usually are in the range of$200 to$400 per hour. In addition, most <br /> systems would require additional software licensing fees and ongoing monthly maintenance support fees. Once the <br /> crosswalk is completed, there will still be the costs of staff time for preparation and reporting as previously expressed <br /> elsewhere in this white paper. <br /> ONGOING REPORTING: <br /> Currently, most entities report annually to Florida Department of Financial Services their AFR through a system known as <br /> LOGER. As noted above, the level of reporting for the AFR is at the fund-type level. More specifically, local governments <br /> currently report expenditures by fund type (i.e. general, special revenue, debt service, capital outlay, etc.), by function <br /> (i.e. 513.00-Financial and Administrative, 521.00- Law Enforcement, 541.00-Road and Street Facilities, etc.) and by major <br /> category(i.e. personal services,operating expenditures/expenses, capital outlay,debt service,grants and aids, and other <br /> uses). The average time to enter the information annually for a representative county is 1 1/2 to 2 days of staff time. <br /> This does not include the time it takes to assimilate the information from the accounting system into the format <br /> required for the AFR. It is our understanding that the state CFO will require units of local government to report to the <br /> individual fund level, by department and by object code. Reporting by object code versus category is a big issue. It is our <br /> estimation that the sheer volume of data to be reported at this expanded level (not to mention the cost of staff to <br /> create and verify the information) will grow by more than 100 times, and that is just for the year-end reporting. <br /> Interpolating this out on a monthly basis for revenue and expenditure reporting at the comprehensive level of detail <br /> requested by the Florida Department of Financial Services realistically could add substantially to this process. Making it a <br /> monthly routine will require another staff person. In addition, currently the AFR reporting requires only reporting of <br /> revenues and expenditures. The proposed UCOA requires reporting on balance sheet accounts as well, creating even <br /> more burden on staff. <br /> Another consideration is the impact that monthly financial reporting will have on governmental computer systems and <br /> networks. Many governments have a substantial number of funds, some that exceed 100, which will be required to <br /> provide reporting. The monthly reporting will require substantial computer resources, which may result in many <br /> governments having to upgrade current systems at a substantial cost. The Summary of Reporting Requirements on this <br /> website h_t_tp://www.mvfloridacfo.com/aadir/CO/ACOAproiectdocuments/SummaryofReportingRequirments.pdf <br /> °`"" 12 <br /> 94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.