My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/10/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
12/10/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 11:05:31 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:06:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/10/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
216
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NX.tif
SmeadsoftID
14238
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ON MOTION BY Dr. Day, ED BY Mr. <br />Stewart, the members ed (4-1) to recommend <br />that the Board ounty Commissioners adopt the <br />pr�and <br />rdinance amending LDR Chapters 911, <br />74. Vice -Chairman Brognano opposed. <br />Chairman Brognano read the following into the record: <br />C. Consideration of Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance Cha <br />to Allow Additional Two Year Extension for Sidewalk Constr <br />Certain Active Subdivisions Platted Prior to 2009. County - <br />[Legislative] <br />Mr. Boling reviewed the information contained in his memorandu <br />October 31, 2013 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of whirl <br />file in the Commission Office. <br />)ter 913 <br />action in <br />nitiated. <br />dated <br />are on <br />Ms. Caldarone thought two years was a long time for individuals iving on <br />streets with no sidewalks when they had bought their house believing th y would <br />have sidewalks. <br />Mr. Boling agreed someone who bought a residence early on w <br />get a functional sidewalk segment until the development was built out, wl <br />why the County had an end date that the sidewalk must be installed. F <br />the County now allowed a two year period and the amendment would <br />additional two years; however sidewalks alongside a main entrance r <br />common areas were required to be built up front or bonded out with <br />time frame. Mr. Boling acknowledged this was a trade off so develope <br />not have to complete sidewalks located in front of currently vacant lots <br />them up during subsequent home construction. <br />Discussion ensued. <br />Vice -Chairman Brognano opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m <br />no one wished to speak, the public hearing was closed. <br />ON MOTION BY Dr. Day, SECONDED BY Vice - <br />Chairman Brognano, the members voted <br />unanimously (5-0) to recommend that the Board of <br />County Commissioners adopt the proposed <br />amendment. <br />PZC/Unapproved <br />P A <br />rctiE 3 <br />Auld not <br />ich was <br />a noted <br />Ilow an <br />ad and <br />shorter <br />would <br />ind tear <br />since <br />NovembOr 14, 2013 <br />177 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.