My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/03/2013AP
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
12/03/2013AP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2018 12:52:24 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:06:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/03/2013
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
287
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000G\S0004NW.tif
SmeadsoftID
14237
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bob Keatin <br /> From: Mike Hotchkiss <br /> Sent: Friday,June 28,2013 5:07 PM <br /> To: Stan Boling; Bob Keating <br /> Cc: Vincent Burke <br /> Subject: RE:Issues Related with Expanding Water and/or Sewer Service Outside the USA <br /> Issues related to expanding water and sewer outside the USA: <br /> 1 . The current system has been designed with transmission mains, pump <br /> stations, storage tanks, treatment facilities, etc. to only serve a finite region <br /> with a relatively standard density. To suddenly make the decision to expand <br /> beyond that finite region to an infinite area that is generally lower density is <br /> very difficult. It is also difficult to design the lower density areas, because you <br /> need large transmission mains and larger pumps to provide fire flow, but the <br /> normal demands associated with a lower density means that the large pumps <br /> rarely flow at their optimum efficiency. <br /> 2. To design transmission mains, treatment facilities, storage facilities, etc, to be <br /> adequate to provide fire flow to a remote region with a relatively low density is <br /> very expensive per capita compared with serving a region designated for a <br /> higher density. This results in higher impact fees and higher maintenance <br /> and depreciation costs than would normally be seen in a higher density <br /> region. <br /> 3. There are also issues related with water quality on serving lower density <br /> areas that have the same fire flow demand, but have a lower average daily <br /> demand. This is due to lower velocities flowing thru water mains designed for <br /> large fire flows, The chlorine residual deteriorates due to longer detention <br /> times in the main and results in poor quality water. The customers then <br /> complain resulting in the need to flush water mains, that waste water that <br /> would normally be sold. This results in increased operation and maintenance <br /> cost per capital resulting in higher rates for customers because all Customers <br /> must subsidize the treatment and maintenance cost of the lower density <br /> areas. <br /> 4. The larger transmission mains, treatment facilities, storage facilities and <br /> Pumps also result in higher depreciation due to the higher value of the <br /> infrastructure. <br /> 5. Unidirectional extensions of the utility lines outside the USA without the <br /> possibility of looping the distribution creates potential dead-end lines that <br /> could contribute to water quality concerns and reliability issues. . <br /> Michael C. Hotchkiss, P.E. (FL) <br /> Capital Projects Manager <br /> Indian River County Utilities <br /> 1801 27th Street AYTACHMENT <br /> 176 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.